States push to regulate, tax booming e-cigarette industry
April 24th, 2014
istock
WASHINGTON While waiting for the debate on electronic cigarettes to heat up on Capitol Hill, several state and local governments are pressing ahead with their own agendas for taxing and regulating the popular battery powered smoking alternatives.
Right now, there is no uniform national approach to regulating the vapor based e cigarettes. They are mostly free from federal rules and typically are subject only to state sales taxes.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
But lawmakers in more than two dozen cash strapped states are racing to regulate them as a new source of revenue. For some, this means tacking on an excise tax which is a fee on a specific product, and often dubbed a “sin tax” when applied to socially shunned products like cigarettes.
Minnesota has led the charge and is currently the only state that s got a specific tax policy for e cigarettes on the books. The 2012 decision subjects vapor inhalers to a 95 percent tax that is stapled to the wholesale cost of the product.
According to the Minnesota Department of Revenue, e cigarettes are considered tobacco products and are subject to the state s tobacco tax. Distributors there are required to pay the tobacco tax or risk losing their license. Retailers must purchase e cigarettes from distributors licensed by the state and are expected to collect and remit sales tax on e cigarette sales.
In total, Minnesota estimates it will bring in $1.16 billion from all of its tobacco taxes in fiscal year 2014 2015.
Other states are taking notice.
In his 2015 budget proposal last month, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie pitched a plan to hike taxes on electronic cigarettes to match the rate of regular cigarettes about $2.70 per pack.
Supporters say increasing taxes will keep them out of the hands of children and teens.
But critics argue treating traditional cigarettes the same as e cigs will hurt small businesses and strip smokers of the incentive to quit.
Small businesses like convenience stores and especially brick and mortar vape shops will be hardest hit by this $35 million tax increase, Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist wrote in a March 11 dated letter sent to the New Jersey Legislature and shared with
Norquist also warns that raising taxes on consumers will significantly decrease in state sales, resulting in increased cross border tax leakage.
In recent years, as much as 40 percent of all cigarettes smoked in New Jersey were smuggled into the state illegally, resulting in a loss of more than $500 million in uncollected tax revenue each year, he says.
By making New Jersey uncompetitive in e cigarette pricing, the state would encourage smuggling, which will cost New Jersey small businesses tens of thousands of dollars in lost revenue, he said.
But to some, like New Jersey Democratic Assemblyman Dan Benson, taxing e cigarettes is not only a fiscal responsibility but also sends an important message to would be smokers.
If e cigarettes are taxed less than regular cigarettes, we re sending a message out there that they re somehow safer, and I think the jury is out on that, he recently told a New Jersey radio station.
Meanwhile, a similar proposal in Washington state recently died in the Legislature. That plan would have redefined vapor products the kind used in e cigarettes as tobacco substitutes and tobacco products. By changing their classification to a tobacco product, lawmakers were initially hoping to slap a 95 percent tax on them, projected to generate an additional $40 million for the state.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the vapor from e cigarettes has far fewer of the toxins found in smoke compared to traditional cigarettes.
However, the Atlanta based agency says it s too soon to say how much of a health benefit the alternative to traditional cigarettes offers. Both traditional cigarettes and e cigarettes contain nicotine.
Tim McAfee, CDC s director of Smoking and Health, says while it s reasonably certain that if someone who smokes a pack a day switched completely to e cigarettes it could represent a health benefit, there are still many caveats and buts around that.
Many argue that the reason state and local leaders are pushing so hard to tax e cigarettes is because they ve become addicted to the massive amounts of money brought in through the Master Settlement Agreement a 25 year settlement that forces the nation s top tobacco companies to pay out billions of dollars in profit to help pay for smoking related health care costs in some states.
The 1998 settlement, for example, makes Philip Morris USA, the nation s largest cigarette maker, pay $3.5 billion annually. The second largest tobacco company, Reynolds Tobacco Co., has handed out more than $2 billion a year.
In total, the landmark settlement requires tobacco product manufacturers to make $206 billion in payments to 46 states and U.S. territories.
If e cigarettes are regulated the same way, that might mean millions more for states still struggling to find financial footing following the recession.
Utah, North Dakota and the District of Columbia have included e cigarettes as part of their indoor smoking bans, setting up the argument that the vapor sticks should be regulated like other tobacco products in the state. Wyoming, Tennessee, New York and Colorado are among nine other states that have already dumped e cigarettes into the tobacco product category.
FOX NEWS FIRST NEWSLETTER
Daily must read stories from the biggest name in politics
Today House hangs IRS hopes on Holder’s help Subscribe Get the full text emailed to you daily
Health canada tracks e-cigarettes
As electronic cigarettes straddle the line between legal and illegal, Health Canada is trying to find out exactly how many of these devices are being sold.
Ottawa is about to spend up to $230,000 to study how many electronic cigarettes have been sold over the past two years as well as current monthly totals.
Electronic cigarettes are surging in popularity but exist in a legal grey zone. They can be sold if they release vapour but not nicotine. They also cannot be advertised as a healthy alternative to cigarettes.
But the devices can be sold with vapour cartridges that are easily swapped out for nicotine, and demand is booming.
I ve had (customers say) everything from you ve saved my lungs to you ve saved my marriage, said Phil Ralph, employee of the downtown Ottawa retailer e Steam.
The company is two years old but has expanded to 14 locations in Ontario. Buyers can purchase an electronic cigarette kit, starting around $80 and ranging up to hundreds of dollars.
Each device comes with a vapour cartridge. Vials of up to 24 milligrams of nicotine can be bought separately.
Ralph is himself a 12 year smoker who tried and failed several times to quit, but is now onto e cigarettes.
I haven t had a cigarette in over three months. The switch was seamless, he said.
But anti smoking groups have called for tighter restrictions on e cigarettes. The Canadian Lung Association called them gimmicky, unproven methods and urged smokers to use other methods.
The government has mostly followed suit.
To date there is not sufficient evidence that the potential benefits of e cigarettes in helping Canadians to quit smoking outweigh the potential risks, says a statement from Health Canada.
Without scientific evidence, Health Canada continues to advise Canadians against the use of these products.
Ottawa is now paying an outside company to sort out how many smoking cessation aids are being sold.
AC Nielsen of St. Laurent, Que., has been pegged for a $133,000 contract to study retail sales of electronic cigarettes and non pharmaceutical nicotine replacement therapy products.
Health Canada wants to know how many have been sold in the past two years, plus ongoing monthly reports. The contract runs through all of fiscal 2014 2015, but can be renewed for a second year for $100,000.
The office of Health Minister Rona Ambrose isn t saying if the research could be used to craft new legislation.
I don t have any further info for you at this point, said spokesman Michael Bolkenius.
Bolkenius said Health Canada is currently sending out letters to e cigarette vendors to bring them into compliance with the laws.
He said e cigarette manufacturers would need to make the scientific case that the benefits of their products outweigh the harms. He said no companies have so far applied to have their products authorized.
