Posted on November 22, 2012

0

It s among the most important public health problems in the world

Allow or ban in the workplace?

preventing the devastation wreaked by smoking. Experts predict the global death toll of cigarettes will approach 1 billion lives lost this century. But misguided or agenda driven public health officials worldwide are condemning one hope for slowing this catastrophe electronic cigarettes, or e cigarettes, and certain low risk tobacco products that have the potential to reduce the risk caused by smoking.

Public health officials are gathered at a conclave in Seoul, South Korea, for the revision of an international tobacco treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). They ll be taking up e cigarettes and perhaps even calling for a ban.

The logic employed by these critics is that since e cigarettes look like actual cigarettes, they must be curbed as well.

But what the critics see as a bug is actually a feature e cigarettes can work as a public health tool precisely because of their resemblance to the real thing.

E cigarettes work by giving addicted smokers the nicotine they crave, without the toxic smoke. They supply a variable amount of nicotine in a watery vapor and produce a red glow at the tip when puffed upon.

That similarity especially the nicotine, the addictive substance smokers crave is what is best about e cigarettes. The nicotine hit they supply matches, more or less, that of inhaling cigarette smoke, as do the behavioral mannerisms of holding the thing as though it was their familiar friend, the conventional cigarette.

But that s where the similarity ends. There are no products of combustion to be inhaled hundreds of times a day, and hence no tobacco toxins.

E cigarette users they call themselves vapers get the satisfying drug but none of the tarry smoke. That s why many smokers who switch to e cigarettes succeed in staying smoke free.

An important fact, rarely discussed by public health gurus, is that the patches, gums, and drugs they recommend as safe and effective are all too often neither. Among the 46 million smokers in the United States, well over half say they want to quit, and more than one third attempt to do so each year but less than one tenth succeed.

Despite those sorry statistics, those in charge at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration, the World Health Organization, and the European Union health commission argue for sticking with currently approved cessation methods.

Lethally addictive cigarettes remain available on every street corner in Brussels and Atlanta while authorities denounce e cigarettes (the product is already banned in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand). And while, as of today, e cigarettes remain available in the European Union, a new Tobacco Products Directive is expected this year to call for a ban on e cigarettes (while tightening the existing proscription on the nearly harmless type of Swedish smokeless, snus). Such measures would leave addicted smokers with few reliable means of quitting.

Prohibiting the safest form of nicotine delivery will increase, not stem, cigarette related deaths. Truly informing smokers about reduced risk nicotine products, such as e cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, and increasing access to these products is a good way to save millions of lives.

Article by Gilbert Ross, MD

Share this

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this Like Loading… Related Posted in General &larr Clearstream Air Study New Study Confirms that Electronic Cigarettes are Much Safer than Real Ones, Suggests Minimal Risks of Secondhand Vapor

Kretek – wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How did marlboro brand cigarettes get their name?

  1. Hanusz, Mark Smoke A Century of Kretek pp. 140 143
  2. “June 3, 1999 Where There’s Smoke, There’s Kretek The Cigarette Industry in Indonesia”. Retrieved 2007 07 20.
  3. “Cigarette Production & Consumption”. Retrieved 2007 12 30.
  4. “A Touch of Clove”. Retrieved 2007 12 30.
  5. Sejarah Indonesia a Timeline of Indonesian History
  6. Hanusz, Mark (2000) Kretek The Culture and Heritage of Indonesia’s Clove Cigarettes, Equinox Publishing ISBN 979 95898 0 0
  7. Kretek
  8. J.L. Malson, E.M. Lee, R. Murty, E.T. Moolchan and W.B. Pickworth (February 2003). “Clove cigarette smoking biochemical, physiological, and subjective effects”. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 74 (3) 739 745. doi 10.1016/S0091 3057(02)01076 6. PMID 12543240.
  9. G.C. Clark (1989). “Comparison of the inhalation toxicity of kretek (clove cigarette) smoke with that of American cigarette smoke. I. One day exposure”. Archives of toxicology 63 (1) 1 6. doi 10.1007/BF00334625. PMID 2742495.
  10. G.C. Clark (1990). “Comparison of the inhalation toxicity of kretek (clove cigarette) smoke with that of American cigarette smoke. II. Fourteen days, exposure”. Archives of toxicology 64 (7) 515 521. doi 10.1007/BF01971829. PMID 2073125.
  11. (December 1988). “Evaluation of the health hazard of clove cigarettes. Council on Scientific Affairs”. Journal of the American Medical Association 260 (24) 3641 36444. doi 10.1001/jama.260.24.3641. PMID 3057254.
  12. “A bill to protect the public health by providing the Food and Drug Administration with certain authority to regulate tobacco products. (Summary)” (Press release). Library of Congress. 20 May 2004. Retrieved 2007 08 01.
  13. “Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students United States, 2002”. Retrieved 2007 12 30.
  14. Paul Smalera (2009 06 08). “Cool, Refreshing Legislation for Philip Morris”. The Big Money from Slate. Retrieved 2009 06 22.
  16. “Clove encounter Philip Morris acquires Sampoerna”. Retrieved 2007 12 30.
  17. “Delaware Division of Libraries Blog”.
  21. “Brazil bans sale of clove cigarettes”. April 13, 2012.